Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Across vignette attribute specifications, no differences between respondents' attitudes towards the hand hygiene and the medication error frames were observed.
When family members were described as intervening in a challenging rather than an inquiring way (variable nr 5) this only had negative effects on approval and support of the behaviour in the medication error frames.
Similar(58)
Notably, a false attribution of error had positive effects on the affective ratings in the medication error frame.
There were no significant differences in the affective ratings or in the composite score in the medication error frame versus the hand hygiene frame.
There were no significant differences in HCPs' responses to family members intervening in the medication error frame compared to the hand hygiene frame (table 2).
Whether the situation was witnessed by another HCP (variable nr 3) was only significantly associated with the affective ratings of the medication error frame but not with any of the other outcomes.
The profession of the HCP involved in the interaction with the family member (variable nr 4) impacted on the evaluations of the medication errors frames: The behaviour was more likely to be approved and seen as positively affecting the relationship in scenarios in which the family member intervened towards a doctor rather than a nurse.
In this study, we found some differences in attributes affecting outcomes measures (eg, approval and affective ratings), but only minor differences in overall level of support between medication error and hand hygiene frames.
Irrespective of vignette attributes, affective ratings were more positive when the family member intervening was a male in the hand hygiene frame while they were higher for female family members in the medication error scenario.
The medical error taxonomies utilized were the Patient Safety Event Taxonomy and the NCC MERP Taxonomy of Medication Error.
The occurrence of a medication error can threaten patient safety.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com