Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
The median variability for the pwTDI variables were 5.3 (1.9 9.8)% and the median coefficient of repeatability 0.63 (0.38–1.48) cm/s between the two observers (table 5).
When comparing the individual mean SUV-measurements in all 20 scans, a median variability (inter-reader CoV) of 3.83% (range 1.80 7.46%) could be observed (see Table 1).
The median background variability ranged from 6.48 to 32.2%, measured from the largest and the smallest spheres, respectively, across all sphere sizes (total of 576 warm background VOIs), with a median variability of 16.5% (mean 16.7%).
While the median variability for most PCBs was zero, large variability was found in several congeners.
The change in variability (defined as the median variability during the SBT minus the median variability prior to the SBT (that is delta = during to pre), was also computed.
A similar median variability but smaller range compared to our participants was observed in two published studies measuring changes in PCB levels across three and nine years.
Similar(50)
A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare median ETCO2 variability between groups.
Results: Significant differences were found for median ETCO2 variability between the three groups.
However, median TRT variability was about 10% for SUVmax and 15% for MTV in the reference group with corresponding maximums of about 25% for SUVmax and 50% for MTV which is in the range of the present study.
However, this model and related in silico methods have been extensively tested clinically [33, 35 37, 42] and validated for specific patients and in predicting both the median and variability of clinical trial outcomes, as well as for predicting specific intervention outcomes [23, 43, 44].
This approach permitted the detection of 257 small molecules, with total instrument analysis time of 24 min (two injections at 12 min each), while maintaining a median process variability for all compounds of 9%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com