The census-tract level facensus-tract level factorslusion in the composite variable werevaluatedhousehold income, median house value, median rent, percent high school diploma, percent college diploma, percent proforsinclusionree, percent employed, and percent below the poverty line.
As previously mentioned in Section 3.3, we divided our 45 subjects into groups based on two classifications as follows: (1) "B ⩾ median" and "B < median," and (2) "Percent B ⩾ median" and "Percent B < median".
Compared with the left breast, the right breast had a 0.7%% higher median for percent water.
Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population (mean, standard deviation (SD), median and percent).
The results are presented as median (range), percent and mean deviation from norms.
Median relative percent difference for the six replicates collected during the study was 13%.
The median percent viability was 92% with median viable total expanded cells of 64 × 10.
Mean, standard deviation, median, percent change in mean, percent change in median, and log rank p value were calculated using R 2.6.2.
Mean, standard deviation, median, percent change in mean, percent change in median, and log rank p value were calculated using R 2.6.2 [ 58].
The median percent of calves reported as treated per farm was 6.5% (range 0 100%) while the median percent of cows and heifers reported as treated was 0.9% (range 0 15%).
