Exact(7)
Whereas the first exposure fitness function assesses the median field values, the second one, f 4, also represents the spatial homogeneity (i.e., absence of large spatial variations) of the field strengths, by minimizing the maximal (95th percentiles) field values instead of the median field values in f 3: f_{4}=100frac{E^{text{ESL}}_{95}}{E^{text{ESL}}_{text{95max}}}, (9).
In order to allow comparison of rooms for the two ESL distributions, room identifiers are indicated between brackets as Ri, with i = 1..18 the room number among the rooms with ESL > 0. Tables 5 and 6 also show the average median field values for all rooms with a certain ESL value.
Seven patients without nodal disease were treated using either a three- or four-field planned technique (median field dimensions 17 × 14 × 15 cm) and four patients were treated with parallel opposed fields (median field dimensions 14 × 16 cm).
For anal margin cancers with no extension into the anal canal, a direct field was used (five patients, median field dimensions 10 × 10).
Visceral fat content was performed by acquiring images at the L4/L5 junction using a three-point Dixon sequence (TR/TE/number of averages/flip angle 50 ms/3.4.604.60, 5.75 matrix°, matrix 160×109, median field of view (FOV) 440 mm, range 400 480 mm to suit subject size with 70% phase FOV).
26 Subcutaneous and visceral fat content was performed by acquiring images at the L4/L5 junction using a three-point Dixon sequence (TR/TE/number of averages/flip angle 50 ms/3.4.604.60, 5.75 matrix0°, matrix 160×109, median field of view (FOV) 440 mm, range 400 480 mm to suit subject size with 70% phase FOV).
Similar(53)
This section shows that previously developed solutions either do not optimize exposure or either the optimization is done for a low median or average field strength in the entire building, whereas our solution progresses the work in [10] and is able to minimize the average whole-body exposure of the actual persons that are present in the different rooms of the building (user-centric approach).
median destructive field.
During AF demagnetization, the median destructive field (MDF) was over 30 to 40 mT (Figure 6a).
Median destructive field (MDF) with respect to each laboratory-induced ARM during SAFD was calculated to see a magnetic hardness to the remanence in relation to coercivity and average grain size of the magnetic minerals.
The median destructive field (MDF) is higher than 30 mT, which indicates that the remanence is very stable and hard (there are specimens with an MDF higher than 70 mT).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com