Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
According to the AutoDock 4.0 article, the median error range in energy estimation for any protein-ligand evaluation is 1.5-2.0 1.5-2.0l.
The median error range of the energy estimation reported in AutoDock 4.0 article is for the total ∆G score between the experimental and predicted values, whereas in this case it is for individual residue contributions.
The contribution from the residue is then determined by calculating the difference in interaction score of the mutant and the wild-type protein (∆∆G value)." According to the AutoDock 4.0 article, the median error range in energy estimation for any protein-ligand evaluation is 1.5-2.0 1.5-2.0l.
Similar(57)
After calibration the median error ranged between −0.59 and +0.28 (average 0.02, SD 0.08), with 70 of the 91 files having a median error <±0.05 ppm.
For example, the median error values ranges between 36 and 43 meters.
Descriptive statistics (including mean, median, standard error, ranges for continuous data and frequencies and percentages for categorical data) were reported for safety and pharmacokinetic analyses.
Studies of CGM accuracy have shown that the median error during hypoglycemia ranges from 13 to 24 mg/dL (15, 16) so that some episodes of true biochemical hypoglycemia are missed by CGM, and some CGM readings in the hypoglycemic range occur when the true glucose concentration is >70 mg/dL.
For the 91 files tested, the original median error of any given file ranged between −2.8 and +8.4 ppm (average 1.4, SD 2.3).
All devices except S1 depicted a median VT value within the 10% error range.
The median error of the measured limitations was 1.9° (interquartile range 1.1° - 4.4°).
The total activity measured within the FOV had a median error of − 0.63% across all activity ranges from all sites (8 sites × 5 days of imaging = 40 measurements) (mean 4.71%, range − 23.9 65.0%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com