Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
Non-parametric rank sum tests were used to compare median differences in time to diagnosis between age groups, sex, and different deprivation quintiles.
Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to compare median differences in VAS and PRI between perc-NMES and trans-NMES.
Relative to monocytes obtained from untreated healthy controls, median differences in viable intracellular MAC at 2, 4, and 6 weeks were -0.76, -0.94, and -0.47 log10 cfu/mL of lysate for cells from patients receiving GM-CSF versus -0.15, -0.11, and -0.19 log10 cfu/mL for cells from patients receiving azithromycin alone.
The Wilcoxon matched-pairs test (non-parametric) was used to test the median differences in paired data.
To quantify the propagation of parameter uncertainty, a 95% projection range (PR) was computed, and sensitivity analyses were performed.Under the assumption that AS cannot outperform UC, the projected median differences in 10-year DSCM between AS and UC when diagnosed at ages 40, 55, and 70 years were 2.6% (PR = 1.4%-5.1%), 1.5% (PR = 0.5%-3.5%), and 0.6% (PR = 0.0%-2.4), respectively.
Median scores and median differences in TPB measures concerning intentions are presented in Table 2.
Similar(37)
Median difference in FPG was not significantly different between groups.
For six animals (animals 379, 762, 766, 768, 769 and 774), the median difference in repeated observations was significantly (P < 0.05) different from zero, though the median difference in each case was only a fraction of a degree (range: -0.3°C to 0.2°C).
The primary end point was median difference in 6MWD at 16 weeks, which was not statistically different between groups (+11 m, 95% CI: 0.0 22 m, P=0.07).
The median difference in vascular density under narrow-band and conventional light was not significantly different in black lesions (0.8%) or white lesions (1.0%); however, a difference of 4.5% was noted for red lesions (p <.001).
The median difference in EBL between groups was 22 mL; 95% confidence interval = -158 to 236 mL.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com