Sentence examples for mechanical performance differences from inspiring English sources

The results indicated that the mechanical performance differences between control and β-APN treated animals are limited to areas of lower mineralization, a logical outcome given the fact that the β-APN effect on bone was necessarily restricted to bone that was formed during the period of treatment.

To reflect the mechanical performance difference of CSWs in different directions, a more precise theoretical model, the assimilated orthotropic plate (AOP), is presented to simulate CSWs.

The two coatings differed in their formulation and the major differences in mechanical performance were in their static strain to first crack development and their fracture toughness, where Coating A was significantly tougher than coating B. During strain cycling coating crack development was monitored using optical observations and surface replicas.

At that time, no differences in mechanical performance were found between samples taken from the interior and the exterior part of the warship [24].

This is a very useful property as it may enable material to be cut in any direction from the pericardium for use in heart valve leaflets with minimal differences in mechanical performance.

It should be emphasized that this increase does not imply that it is solely responsible for the observed differences in mechanical performance (decreases in all of collagen cross-links contribute to the inferior mechanical behavior of the treated animals), but Pyd, divalent, and the corresponding ratio are the only cross-links that can be spectroscopically monitored, to date.

Eventually, the differences of the mechanical performance among the following three models, i.e. present, Mindlin and Reddy for composite laminated plates are discussed in different modulus and span-to-thickness ratios.

Different biomechanical studies have compared the initial fixation strength of metal and bioabsorbable interference screws in animal and human cadaveric models and concluded that there are no significant differences in their mechanical performance (Kousa et al. 2001).

Test results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the mechanical performance in terms of peak racking load and stiffness between shearwalls containing finger-joined studs (up to 5 6 joints) and shearwalls containing unjointed studs.

The behavior and failure modes of these specimens were investigated, the difference of the mechanical performance due to various strengthening techniques was compared, and the effect of parameters, such as the bond length, prestressing force, and the anchorage, on the behavior and failure modes of specimens was analyzed.

No appreciable differences were found between the mechanical performance of splices under incremental and repeated tensile loadings.