Automatic corrections saved onto the matrix of CAA are only optimal for the particular day on which those measuring procedures were conducted and there is no guarantee whatsoever that the above-mentioned corrections would be optimal for every single measurement conducted over time.
Counting and measuring procedures were carried out without knowledge of the group assignments.
Furthermore, an automatic measuring procedure is desirable for long-term investigations.
Both the SHP-2 apparatus features and the measuring procedure were detailed elsewhere [15, 19, 22, 27, 33].
This new wear measuring procedure is classifiable as a digital wear evaluation method, included in the field of digital tribology.
The measuring procedure is based on the fact that the amplitude and frequency of vibration increases with the increased drill blunting at the moment of cutting the material.
Additionally, in most cases, the staining and measuring procedure is highly species specific.
The measure procedure was described by Ohnishi et al [39].
As before, a general linear model repeated-measures procedure was applied.
The multifactorial analysis of variance with repeated measures procedure was used to compare time courses of fluid balance between groups.
