Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
It appears that minimum axial rigidity is a better model for measuring bone rigidity than average axial rigidity.
As shown, minimum axial rigidity appears to be a better model for measuring bone rigidity than average axial rigidity.
Similar(58)
First, it measured bone health by looking at bone density in the heel by ultrasound.
The problem is how you measure bone mass.
Finally, 3D bones are carefully realigned with the matched 2D stroke segments while enforcing important constraints such as bone rigidity and depth.
Thus, delivering local BMP, even to intact bone, can help promote bone rigidity, and with an HA/TCP carrier a dose-dependent increase was noted.
Often occurring via the promotion of angiogenesis, this pathway is affected by diabetes, and theoretically BMPs can improve bone rigidity and density via vascular regeneration [23, 24, 25].
As RA frequently reduces bone rigidity, tight control strategies for RA itself and osteoporosis are recommended to improve bone quality.
In the average axial rigidity model, the slope of the linear regression was 1.23 and the y-intercept offset was 3142, suggesting that CTRA using average axial rigidity consistently over-predicts bone rigidity.
This study proposes that not only is there a correlation between µCT-derived data and bone rigidity, but that structural rigidity analysis based on µCT data can be successfully employed to non-invasively assess the axial rigidity of bones with metabolic pathologies.
We can distinguish between these two scenarios by measuring membrane rigidity using vesicles made of model lipids and purified hopanoids.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com