Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
All measures were scored with a blind procedure (i.e. the scorer was unaware of the aims of the research conducted).
DT measures were scored by four raters (α = .81) using the Consensual Assessment Technique, from which a composite creativity index (CCI) was derived.
The following behavioral measures were scored: the times spent in the light and dark compartments, the number of transitions between the two compartments, and the latency of the initial movement from the light to the dark room.
HRQL measures were scored according to the developers' guidelines.
All of these measures were scored as "yes" or "no".
Measures were scored according to developers' instructions, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
Similar(45)
The measures are scored based on the presence of a specific item and the specificity and action-orientation of language.
The items of both measures are scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all to 3 = severely).
Each of these measures was scored on a scale 0 (incomplete test) to 4 (highest performance).
Each of the three SPPB measures is scored from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater physical function.
All measures are scored between 0 and 10, with higher values indicating worse disease activity, function or well-being.
More suggestions(15)
procedure were scored
measures were envisioned
measures were enacted
measures were defeated
measures were put
measures were extended
measures were threatened
measures were needed
measures were obtained
measures was scored
measures were rejected
measures were passed
measures were taken
measures were banned
measures were used
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com