Suggestions(5)
Exact(4)
> -wrap-foot> All correlations with SF-8 scales and summary measures were negative, as expected.
The point estimates for associations between PN and BC, and HRV measures were negative, but gaseous pollutants (SO2 and CO) were positively related.
Adjusted associations between CMD and resilience are displayed in table 4. At baseline, social measures were negative confounders and the association remained significant after full adjustment.
One of the primary and most of the secondary outcome measures were negative, and although some of our positive findings are driven by a few individuals, the reduction of GITI (24% lower than control) is a robust outcome consistent with earlier probiotic research on this product.
Similar(55)
The latent correlation between both measures is negative, r = −.51, p < .001, which also supports the discriminant validity of the measures.
For men, a large effect of asymmetry on the variance in e A was present since 1980 in the form of negative contribution of the covariance between e 0 and A' to the variance in e A. The relationship between the two measures was negative for males (Table 1) and increased until 2005.
For the brain response, the correlation was positive and was found when accepted and rejected offers were compared, whereas the correlation with cardiac measures was negative and was strongest when fair and unfair offers were compared.
As you can see, the latest index measure was negative 49 (with a margin of error of 2 percentage points), compared to negative 29 a year ago.
A negative income/total expenditure elasticity means the measure is negative.
The correlation between the abstract dimension and the routine measure is negative, while is positive with the manual task and the education variable.
Note that if a confidence measure is negative, it means that the image is outside the confidence interval of the image and the confidence measure is assigned to be zero.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com