Sentence examples for measures were frequency from inspiring English sources
Outcome measures were frequency of attacks, drug taking, MIDAS, HIT-6, SF-36 and BAQ (Body Awareness Questionnaire).
Main outcome measures were frequency of visual, somatosensory and higher cortical dysfunction (HCD) symptoms in teenage migraineurs population during the aura, and also within each individual.
Outcome measures were frequency, intensity (evaluated by visual analogue scale; VAS), and quality of the subjects' sensations perceived during treatments (assessed with the "acupuncture sensation scale").
The main outcome measures were frequency of adverse events and preventable adverse events in hospitalised hip fracture patients of 65 years and older, and strategies to prevent them in the future.
The main outcome measures were frequency of publication, time to publication, impact factor, CONSORT (for Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) score, STROBE (for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) score, and minor and major inconsistencies between the abstract and the full paper publication.
Secondary safety outcome measures were: frequency of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (CBG ≤3.3 mmol/l OR <2.2 mmol/l with autonomic symptoms (sweating, tremor, palpitations, tachycardia)); frequency of asymptomatic hypoglycaemia (CBG ≤3.3 mmol/l OR <2.2 mmol/l without symptoms); and frequency of hypokalaemia (serum potassium <3.5 mmol/l).
The primary outcome measure was mean serum vitamin D level, and the secondary outcome measures were frequencies of patients with vitamin D levels <20 ng/ml and levels <30 ng/ml.
The main outcomes measured were frequency and types of medical errors such as diagnostic, management and documentation errors.
The primary measure was frequency of headaches and the following reductions were recorded from pre- to post-treatment: LCT/CBT, 52.1%; Avoid/CBT, 41.4%; and WL, 16.2%.
The second measure is "frequency," or the total number of victimizations divided by the total number of victims (Hope 1995; Osborn and Tseloni 1998; Tseloni and Pease 2015; Trickett et al. 1992 , 1995.
The primary outcome measure was frequency of revision surgery.
