Sentence examples for measures were compared with from inspiring English sources

Measurements across multiple timepoints were compared using a repeat measurement analysis of variance, while single time point measures were compared with a two-sided, independent-samples Student t test with adjustment for birth-weight z score and participant sex.

Framework invasiveness measures were compared with existing common software metrics including size (lines of code), cyclomatic complexity, and object-oriented coupling.

Two consistency measures were compared with the results in the scientific literature: the first was the area bounded by the speed profile and the average weighted speed; the second was the standard deviation of operating speeds for each segment.

Scores on the anxiety measures were compared with regard to their ability to predict subsequent ratings of procedural and background pain levels, pain medication usage, and physical and emotional functioning upon discharge.

A comprehensive set of stroke measures were compared with adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics.

Creativity measures were compared with the mood board themes to further investigate any relationships between mood board types and the consensual assessment.

Linear measures are compared with complexity measures (nonlinear) based on statistics from the underlying joint recurrence plots.

The performance measures are compared with other methods, and values are tabulated.

The measures are compared with noiseless image, and minimal differences are there.

Responsiveness of the measures was compared with the effect size (with ≥ 0.8 being considered large).

Performance of the clinical group on all test measures was compared with a group of 14 typically developing (TD) children (10 female) who were recruited from local schools.