Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Measures were coded using pre-defined criteria considered important for scale development and health outcome measurement [ 42- 51].
All these measures were coded as "1" if respondents reported in the affirmative, or else coded as "0".
Each of the outcome measures of interest such as change in a SNAPW behaviour or health literacy measures were coded as significantly improved or not significantly improved based on the results reported in the paper for each outcome of interest.
Similar(57)
Frequency and quality measures are coded by the OT using information provided by an interview at subsequent visits.
Public health districts with positive change (e.g. score of "agree" 12 months ago changed to "strongly agreed" in the current measure) were coded 1 to indicate "improvement during 12 months", those with no change or negative change were coded as 0 to indicate "No improvement during 12 months".
Thus, within DEMIG POLICY, the content of each policy measure is coded through four variables – two coding the issue addressed, two coding the group targeted: 1.
This measure was coded as categorical variables according to the quintile of the measure across all counties in the Area Resource File.
Therefore, each self-reported symptom measure was coded as a (0/1) variable scored 1 for the presence of any symptoms, and SAS PROC GENMOD was used to estimate Equations 1 and 2 as logistic generalized estimating equations.
A measure was coded as having acceptable internal consistency if correlations for the total scale and each subscale were calculated [ 19] and a Cronbach's alpha >0.70 (continuous or dichotomous scales) or Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) >0.70 was reported for the total scale and each sub-scale [ 18, 19].
We additionally found that many reviews used multiple dose delivered measures which were coded as 'other' by both raters (Fig. 3.11).
Main Outcome Measures: Ethical issues were coded by 2 independent raters into 24 different categories and a reconciliation session was used to resolve discrepancies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com