Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Assessors of outcome measures were blinded to group allocation.
Research staff who conducted anthropometric measures were blinded to children's urinary BPA concentrations.
The nature of the intervention meant that blinding of the participants was not possible, but all investigators performing the outcome measures were blinded to treatment allocation.
Both the subject and the technician responsible for monitoring blood pressure, heart rate, and cerebral Doppler measures were blinded to the session type.
The main outcome measures were blinded assessments of physical function; SF-36 physical function (PF) scale and six-minute walk test (6MWT), and health-related quality of life (SF-36) conducted at 1, 8 and 26 weeks after hospital discharge.
Owners were blinded to treatment allocation until the end of the study period (6 months), and the clinician and technician responsible for recording the outcome measures were blinded to intervention allocation until completion of data analysis.
Similar(54)
The technician responsible for performing all measures was blinded to subject group.
The staff obtaining the outcome measures was blinded for randomization group.
As an assessor-blinded randomised controlled study, the researcher evaluating the outcome measure was blinded to the participant's treatment allocation.
However, the physician involved in measuring the primary outcome measure is blinded and blinded double data-entry is performed to assure correct data-entry.
Both families and diagnosticians administering measures were blind to children's treatment condition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com