Sentence examples for measures revealed significant from inspiring English sources

None of the performance measures revealed significant differences between the placebo and gaboxadol treatment.

Analysis of mixed models for repeated measures revealed significant positive effects on the BDI and SDQ total scores, as well as less Conduct problems and Hyperactivity in SDQ measures from the experimental group mothers, comparing pre with post-test.

Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed significant improvements in the score on the Activities of Daily Living Scale during the 8 weeks of physical therapy; post hoc testing indicated that the change in the score at 8 weeks was significantly greater than the change at 4 weeks, and that the change at 4 weeks was significantly greater than that at 1 week.

The analysis of the dispositional measures revealed significant gender differences for the scores of the systemizing quotient (SQ) (df = 38, t = −1.81, P = 0.039) and the personal distress subscale of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) (df = 38, t = 1.77, P = 0.042) (Table 1).

Repeated measures revealed significant reduced problem behavior in course of the program.

General Linear Models (GLM) repeated measures revealed significant interactions between OIDP and change scores of the reference variables (p < 0.05).

This suggests that even the potentially less sensitive measures reveal significant changes during the chills response, alluding to the potency of its affects on the nervous system.

Natural selection analyses, in which the proportion of surviving seeds was used as a fitness measure, revealed significant or marginally significant directional selection for thicker pericarps in four of the six populations examined (P < 0.09), whereas it was nonsignificant but positive in the remaining population (Fukagawa; P > 0.5) (Table 3).

Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant interactions of heat waves and turbidity for H′ and community composition.

Mixed models repeated measures analysis revealed significant differences between the study arms regarding total PANSS score change favouring n-3 PUFA (p = 0.016; effect size (ES) = 0.29).

A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences [mean diff (post-pre) C=7.06±5.57, M=2.68±7.45, p=.029] between migraineurs and non-migraineurs in overall LOS post migraine.