Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
While the API measures preference for healthcare information-seeking behavior for decisions not necessarily already made, the KHOS examines manifest information-seeking and behavioral involvement.
For all of our outcome measures (preference, ratings and colour), we observed an effect for faces in the low-dose condition compared with the sober condition, but not the high-dose condition compared with the sober condition.
The profile consisted of participant information with regards to LBP and health history, examination, imaging, psychosocial measures, preference and previous experience, objective biomechanical assessment, and a classification of the LBP according to the Quebec Task Force (see Table 1)[ 29].
Similar(57)
HRQL scores for health states defined by multi-attribute systems are calculated from models fitted from directly measured preference measurements (see below).
It measures preferences between intervention options by counting the extent to which specified objectives are preferred most [ 2, 3].
The KHOS measures preferences regarding information about healthcare (information-seeking subscale) and active involvement in healthcare (behavioral-involvement subscale).
The Treatment Preferences survey measures preferences for experimental treatments, life support, and palliative care, in the event that no further anti-cancer treatments would be helpful.
The scale contains 11 items measuring preference for verbal and 11 items measuring preference for visual styles of processing.
Of the 11 items measuring preference for verbal processing, seven were retained; of the 11 items measuring preference for visual processing, ten were retained.
Some previous investigations have circumvented the need to control for group behavior by utilizing a shoaling assay to measure preference for social affiliation [1], [8] [15].
Second, we assumed that increased loyalty for a particular TNF antagonist reflects preference, but we did not measure preference directly.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com