All clinical measures were rated by clinicians and not patients.
The effect measures are rated before randomization and 3, 6, and 12 months later.
Patients with higher scores on the measures were rated as being more anxious during dental procedures.
Both health status measures were rated as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor.
All the improvement measures were rated significantly higher in respect of their meaningfulness than of their feasibility.
Item-specific reliability measures were rated as acceptable if ICC ≥ 0.75, POA ≥ 80%, or κ ≥ 0.60, otherwise they were considered non-acceptable [ 14, 15].
Satisfaction with the learning module – i.e., with the learning sessions, action periods, and goals and measures – was rated high by large majorities of the GP respondents.
The CGI measures were rated from three perspectives: the treating therapist (THER), the team of therapists concerned with the patient (TEAM), and the patient him- or herself (PAT).
The extent to which the CRPD addresses each legal empowerment measure was rated Addressed not at all, Addressed partly or Addressed fully.
The main outcome measures were rate of apoptosis, degree of NO-induced apoptosis in chondrocytes, and the timeline of NO-induced apoptosis after high-energy trauma.
