Sentence examples for measures have generally from inspiring English sources

We did not specify the measurement models of the three burnout measures, as these measures have generally proven to be valid and reliable in earlier research [ 35]. Figure 2 provides an overview of the response rates at the three measurement points and the dropout rates.

Moreover, these measures have generally been taken only after fully fledged design of the process or at the operating stage, thus making the preventive/abatement measure a costly affair.

Another limitation is that studies that have used material hardship measures have generally focused on only one type of hardship; however, examining multiple dimensions of hardship allows us to understand how each form may be associated with income poverty and child health.

However, the farm-level costs of preventive biosecurity measures have generally not been assessed.

Where data from both C-PIB PET scans and CSF Aβ have been available, strong correlations between these measures have generally been reported [ 49, 57].

Although similarities and differences in outcomes between the two groups also exist, interpretation of these patterns should also be cautious, as the measures have generally been not been developed for, or extensively validated with ethnic minority populations.

As can be seen in Table 2, the measures had generally acceptable values of internal consistency and most of the measures were approximately normally distributed with values of skewness and kurtosis under the generally accepted values (i.e., skewness < 2 and kurtosis < 4).

This last measure has generally been used with patients with familial ALS, and is a reflection of the amount of activity present in a biological context.

These measures, which have generally not been evaluated in human studies of anti-aging interventions, include tests of mental function [ 36], hand-grip strength [ 37], visual acuity [ 38], walking ability [ 39], or indices based upon total accumulation of "deficits" or health disorders [ 19, 34, 35, 40- 43].

Self-report instruments measuring QoL have generally acknowledged this multidimensional structure, characterising life quality by means of various domains assessed using single or multiple itemsa; the scope of any particular QoL measure is typically determined by a trade-off between the brevity and sensitivity required.

Although humans vary in their response to chemicals, comprehensive measures of susceptibility have generally not been incorporated into human risk assessment.