Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Psychological symptoms and quality of life were assessed online by self-report measures at pre- and post-treatment and were followed up three months later.
There were no significant multivariate changes for the parenting and child measures at pre- and post-intervention, and at the 1 and 2 year follow up.
Total scores were computed for the POMS-Bipolar and SEWDRQ (the two self-report measures) at pre- and post-intervention respectively.
Table 1 shows the means, standard deviations, intra-group, and inter-group effects sizes for the parenting and child measures at pre- and post-intervention, and at the 1 and 2 year follow up for two-parent families.
Table 2 shows the means, standard deviations, intra-group, and inter-group effects sizes for the parenting and child measures at pre- and post-intervention, and at the 1 and 2 year follow up for single mothers.
Results on the outcome measures at pre- and post-treatment for both groups are displayed in Table 3 together with coefficients for the fixed effects of group, time, interaction effect of group and time, and retained pre-treatment covariates.
Similar(54)
Wait-list participants completed measures at pre-test, after 4 months and after 10 months.
Table 1 also shows the process measures at pre-therapy and post-therapy.
To compensate for possibly skewed randomization results, demographic and baseline variables and outcome measures at pre-test were compared between treatment groups.
The sample size calculation provided further evidence in support of future feasibility This was a randomised design, using validated outcome measures at pre-defined follow-up time-points The main limitation is that definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of PRP for this indication cannot be drawn from this pilot trial Soft-tissue disorders related to tendons are termed 'tendinopathies'tendinopathies
Affective states were measured at pre- and posttest using the quick mood scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com