Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
We found that the intra-rater agreement for maxillary, midface, mandibular, inter-maxillary, facial height, hyoid, airway, palate, dental, and soft tissue profile measurements were high with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.80.
Erythropoetin measurements were high and not significantly different between groups on day 1 and reduced by day 15.
ZnPP measurements were high in both groups and subsequently decreased, associated with iron supplementation, but remained significantly higher in the non-malaria group at days 15 (p<0.001) and 30 (p<0.001) (Figure 2).
The penetrometer resistance values of the control measurements were high throughout (Figs. 5, 6, 7).
In contrast, all correlations of the repeated control samples with the corresponding original measurements were high (correlation coefficients: 0.910 0.987).
Correlations between first and second measurements were high owing to the semi-automated nature of the method; for all three recordings, r = 0.99.
Similar(53)
During plateau temperature conditions, kidney temperature measurements were higher than rectal temperature when one site/kidney was measured but were lower than rectal temperature when two sites/kidney were measured suggesting invasive thermometry may have affected measured temperature values.
However, for all 3 parameters, the correlations between parental reports and nurse measurements were higher in the group of children whose body dimensions were measured by the parents.
Results: Average morning measurements were higher than afternoon measurements at all shear rates.
Ground-dwelling arthropod abundance and richness measurements were highest in burned habitats that had remnant long-lived vegetation present, whereas small mammal abundance and richness measurements were highest in continuous expanses of unburned habitat.
Compared to normative standards, SNB measurements were higher among female DS participants.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com