However, in the absence of an interaction effect between the intervention and time of measurement, this difference cannot be ascribed to Primary Care Triple P.
Mortality for patients with sTM measurements was 16%% compared with 9 % for those without sTM measurements, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.17).
The difference between soil bulk densities in different tillage methods was statistically significant from the beginning of growth season to two month after the first irrigation (sixth measurement); while, this difference was not significant from the sixth measurement to the end of growth season.
For determination of the precision of the RSA measurements, the difference between double measurements on 50 patients was computed.
Considering the uncertainty in calculating the lidar DTM (vertical 1σ = 0.15 m on flat terrain) and error in the GNSS measurements, this 0.19 m elevation difference indicates a very good agreement between field data and the terrain model.
This difference in measurement might make interpretation and comparability of these measures inaccurate.
This difference in measurement methods may have caused contrary results.
The results indicated a difference of 0.20 kJ/min between the two methods, suggesting that even after accounting for this difference in measurement the lipodystrophic participants would still display an REE Z-score >2 (mean Z: 2.98 kJ/min).
Additionally, the levels of free sulfide measured by dBB are higher than the total sulfide levels, which suggests that other volatile sulfur-containing species that react with dBB, but not mBB, are volatilized in the procedure for free sulfide measurement, this providing another difference between the mBB and dBB methods.
Limits of agreement were estimated from the SD of differences from the index measurements (mean difference ± 1.96SD), considering the measurements derived from the CLB nurses as index measurements.
