Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
Two methods for contact angle measurement were compared: the sessile drop method and the captive bubble two-probe method.
In order to validate the proposed method we compare the obtained results with manually determined aortic centerlines and a region segmentation by an expert, while the results of the PWV measurement were compared to a validated software (LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands).
Mean values for each measurement were compared between investigators.
Volumes derived from each automated measurement were compared to hand tracing for percent volume overlap, percent volume difference, across-sample correlation, and 3-D group-level shape analysis.
Vibrating wire strain gauges for metallic reinforcements and fibre optic strain gauges for polymeric reinforcements are installed on the embankment and results from field measurement were compared with the simulation results.
Pairs of tumor measurement were compared by ultrasound and computerized tomography scan.
Similar(46)
Characteristic temperatures derived from PL measurement are compared with those obtained by standard conductivity method.
Interobserver variability in choroidal thickness measurement was compared using Bland-Altman plots.
The subsequently registered PaO2 measurement was compared with the first registered PaO2 (Table 3).
This measurement was compared with a predetermined cell count for a completely confluent plate (100%).
Thus, 3D measurement was compared with 2D angles in the frontal and horizontal planes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com