The measurement error indicates that some variation must be expected when using ROM as an outcome measure.
However, the magnitude of the measurement error indicates that using the OM-6 on individual patients may be problematic as change scores have to be large before they can be relied upon.
Some of the observed stability of authoritarianism and, to some degree, protectiveness may be due to measurement errors indicated by reduced internal consistency.
When analyzing this study's reliability using the SEM and SDD, high measurement error was indicated.
None of our measurement error analyses indicated that any important bias was induced by the classical-like error.
In fact, this spacing should be 2.6 Å that this value does not fall within the range of our measurement error may indicate a calibration error or material that is stressed, related to the fairly large proportion of amorphous-looking grain boundary material that seems to be present in this image.
Measurement error (in percent) indicated good reproducibility in large brain regions (mean error: whole brain 4%, grey matter 5%), but not in smaller subcortical regions (putamen 25%, caudate 55%).
Next, the mean of both bias estimations was calculated (shown in Table 1) resulting a range from −0.44°C (#18) to +0.53°C (#13), which is consistent with the measurement error of ±0.5°C indicated by the manufacturer [27].
The repeatability measure determines the proportion of variance due to variation between individuals where zero indicates that all variance is attributable to variance within individuals (100% measurement error) whilst one indicates all variance is found between individuals (0% measurement error).
This repeatability parameterizes the proportion of variance due to variation between individuals: zero indicates that all variance is attributable to variance within individuals (i. e., 100% measurement error), and one indicates all variance is found between individuals (i. e., 0% measurement error).
