Exact(1)
The collected filters were then measured using Smoke Stain Reflectometer (model 43; Diffusion Systems Ltd).
Similar(59)
Detonation cell sizes were measured using smoked foil technique and analyzed with Matlab image processing toolbox.
Soot content of all PM10 filters was measured using a Smoke Stain Reflectometer (model M43D; Diffusion Systems, London, UK) and transformed into absorption coefficients.
Smoking was measured using the questionnaire by asking patients if they smoked, what they smoked (cigarettes, rolling tobacco, cigars, or pipe tobacco), and how much they smoked.
Particle size distributions in mainstream smoke were measured using a real-time particle size classifier/collector of size-resolved particulate matter over the ultrafine and fine ranges, for subsequent gravimetric determination and chemical characterization.
Secondhand smoke exposure was assessed through the question, 'During the past 7 days, how many days did you stay either with your families or visitors when they smoked within your home?' Secondhand smoke exposure was measured using a graded categorical variable coded from 0 to 2: 0 (no exposure), 1 (exposed 1 4 days) and 2 (exposed 5 or more days).
Nicotine dependence was measured using the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) [ 19], which assesses the amount of cigarettes smoked and the time of the first cigarette after waking.
Smoking behaviours were measured using questions related to the number of cigarettes smoked before prison, years of regular smoking and prior quit attempts.
The velocity of the smoke particulate was measured using phase Doppler particle analysis (PDPA).
Acrolein and 1,3-butadiene in cigarette smoke generally are measured using two separate analytical methods, a carbonyl derivative HPLC method for acrolein and a volatile organic compound (VOC) GC/MS method for 1,3-butadiene.
Was measured using the following questions: "Do you smoke?" Participants who replied positively were coded as current smokers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com