Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The measured sensitivity is 205 mV/g, and the nonlinearity is 0.9% over 0 6 g.
The measured sensitivity is approximately 24 mV (V atm)−1, which is similar to that of traditional pressure sensors.
Our measured sensitivity is 3 × 10−3, the linear dynamic range is from 2 to 16 μM with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.6 μM.
For the incident power less than 100 mW, the terminating-type sensor operates and the measured sensitivity is about 0.095 mV/mW@8 GHz, 0.088 mV/mW@10 GHz and 0.084 mV/mW@12 GHz, respectively.
For the incident power with the improved dynamic range from 100 mW to 150 mW, the coupling-type sensor is adopted and the measured sensitivity is about 9.2 μV/mW@8 GHz, 8.6 μV/mW@8 GHz and 9.0 μV/mW@12 GHz, respectively.
Similar(55)
Deposition of AuNP enhanced the sensitivity by more than a factor of 2. Measured sensitivity was found to be ∼3928 nm/refractive index unit (RIU) in the range of 1.3333 1.3428.
Table 5 gives an example of the results of three experiments with different sample sizes but for which the measured sensitivities were identical.
The results showed that the measuring sensitivity was 0.666 mV/g/3 V and the resonant frequency was 17.1 kHz.
The measured sensitivity values were not adjusted for these losses.
In participants with type 2 diabetes, measured insulin sensitivity was not significantly associated with LnACR (β ± SE: −0.10 ± 0.07; P = 0.14) in a linear regression model.
Another measure of sensitivity is the total factor sensitivity that includes the interactions.
Related(20)
measured exposure is
estimated sensitivity is
assessed sensitivity is
measured speed is
demonstrated sensitivity is
assess sensitivity is
measured position is
measured time is
measured allegory is
measured rate is
measured resistance is
measured quantity is
measured sensitivity achieves
measured motion is
measured resolution is
measured altitude is
measured hypertension is
measured performance is
measured sensitivity satisfies
measured response is
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com