Sentence examples for measure methodological from inspiring English sources

The 11 item PEDro scale was developed by Verhagen et al using the Delphi consensus technique to develop a list of criteria thought by experts in the field to measure methodological quality [ 48].

Taken together, to achieve consistent and replicable patterns of the relationship between emotion and neuroimaging measures, methodological aspects associated with the various neuroimaging techniques may be of similar importance as the definition of emotional cues and task context used to study emotion.

It is arguable that reporting items have no place in instruments measuring methodological quality however, despite increased sensitisation to issues related to the quality of reporting, diagnostic research remains poorly reported [45] and evaluating methodological quality relies on transparent and good quality reporting.

Globally, discrepancies between our results and what is found in the literature might be partly explained by study population differences, different definitions of covariates and NVP measures, methodological designs, possibility of type I and type II errors, and confounding factors considered in the statistical analysis.

There are no accepted criteria for measuring methodological quality in prognostic studies and so this form was a modified version of the form created by de Bock et al (2004), derived from the work by Altman and Lyman (1998) and Laupacis et al (1994).

Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies QUADASS) is a new tool to measure the methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies in systematic reviews.

This article presents two methods – a grading system and a measure of methodological bias – for evaluating the quality of evidence produced by an efficacy study.

However, different paradigms were used to measure crowding (methodological heterogeneity) and therefore results were presented in a narrative way.

The PEDro scale is a validated scale used to assess the quality of randomized controlled rehabilitative studies [ 12- 14] and provides a comprehensive measure of methodological quality [ 15].

First, we did not measure RCT methodological quality directly, as we did not verify the information from the authors or their protocols.

We only included studies that had undergone peer-review as a measure of methodological rigor, and, as a result, excluded reports of other demand-side interventions only available in the grey literature.