Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The rms errors were calculated after the global means were removed from all the differences.
The results from the cross-modal priming experiment are summarized in Table 3 and Figure 3. Before data analyses, erroneous responses as well as latencies that were 2.5 SDs above or below the individual means were removed (altogether 6.7%).
The Rotterdam study and KORA were corrected for sex, age and first 10 principal components from the genome-wide data and outliers deviating more than four standard deviations from principal components or three standard deviations from standardized corrected phenotype means were removed.
Similar(57)
Incorrect responses to the search task, memory task, and catch trials, as well as reaction times (RTs) that were ±3 standard deviations from the mean were removed.
The experimental structure and other timings remained identical to Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, trials from learning blocks with reaction times (RTs) beyond three standard deviations from the mean were removed from analyses (mean = 1.59% [min = 0.69%; max = 2.78%] of trials removed across subjects).
Thus denitrification rates that were greater than three standard deviations from the mean were removed before analysis.
Peaks further removed than 2 nm from features in the corresponding density maps (density larger than 0.5 standard deviations above mean) were removed.
Outliers (>3 SD above group mean) were removed.
Outliers (more than 3 SD above group mean) were removed.
Outlier data (>3 SD above group mean) were removed.
Outliers' RTs outside the 2.5 SD range from the condition mean were removed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com