Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(50)
Statistical significance values of the means were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance.
Comparisons between the group means were evaluated by the unpairedt test.
Analysis of variance was done, and the means were evaluated by Duncan's multiple-range test (SAS Institute 2004).
All data were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and the differences between means were evaluated by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
The analysis of recorded data was carried out using QED and SPSS: After verifying the data's normal distribution and the homogeneity of variance, the means were evaluated with a one-way ANOVA test.
The statistic evaluation of recorded data was carried out using QED and SPSS: After verifying the data's normal distribution and the homogeneity of variance, the means were evaluated with a one-way ANOVA test.
Similar(10)
Significant difference between treatment means was evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and for comparison of the means of the treatments, the LSD test was used at p < 0.05 significance level (Miller and Miller 2010).
When analyzing one-variable experiments with more than 2 groups, significance of differences among means was evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.
The statistical significance of differences between the means was evaluated using the unpaired Student's t test or the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.
The difference between the means was evaluated using student's t test.
Statistical difference between means was evaluated by two-tailed t-test.
More suggestions(15)
modalities were evaluated
conduits were evaluated
needs were evaluated
resources were evaluated
instruments were evaluated
means were assessed
agents were evaluated
methodologies were evaluated
requirements were evaluated
means were declared
means were calculated
means were analysed
means were compared
means were determined
means were weighted
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com