Sentence examples for means were based on from inspiring English sources

Comparisons of means were based on t tests after ensuring that the distributions being compared did not differ significantly from the normal distribution (Kolmogorov Smirnov tests) and did not differ significantly in their variances (Fisher's F tests).

The final genotypic means were based on Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUPs) [17].

Means were based on ten measurements taken through either side of the neural tube (Fig. 4a).

Assessments of pair wise comparisons among month and year means were based on adjusted P-values obtained using the Tukey-Kramer method with family-wise Type I error rate (FWER) set at 0.10, given that the Tukey-Kramer test is known to be conservative [61].

Post-hoc comparisons of Least Squares means were based on 10 t-tests adjusted for multiple comparisons using a sequential Bonferonni correction, because we were not interested in testing all possible pair wise comparisons, just the specific contrasts planned between S. macrophylla vs. 10 other species under ERH (Table 1).

Pair-wise comparisons of treatment group means were based on the Tukey-Kramer adjustment of probability-values for multiple testing.

First, for many statistically less well trained users it is hard to verify to which extent statistical procedures for comparing means are based on theoretical assumptions such as normality or homoscedasticity, i.e. homogeneous or equal variances among all groups.

Comparison of means was based on a t-test.

Notes: Percentages and means are based on weighted and unadjusted data.

All reported means are based on untransformed data for ease of interpretation.

The means are based on 34 conditions from a total of 28 experiments involving the abstract Wason selection task.