Modality de dicto is the modality of propositions ('dictum' means proposition, or close enough).
Schaffer doesn't tell us whether grounding is external or internal but this already means that propositions must have their meanings essentially.
Given the minimal assumption that the relation of logical consequence is reflexive, that means that proposition expressed by a = b is a logical consequence of the proposition expressed by a = a, even though the sentence a = b is not a logical consequence of the sentence a = a.
That means this proposition favours artists with highly visible, personal public profiles, and not every artist has it in them to hang out there in the world with their audience.
As p is arbitrary, this means no proposition has the third truth value.
Note that Swyneshed is here taking the notion of "contradictories" as a syntactical notion, so that it in effect means "a proposition and its negation".
Hence, (varphi not equiv 0) in ([a,b]]), which means [see Proposition 1] that ((varphi (x),varphi '(x))not = 0,0)) for all (xin [a,b]]).
Since {y n } was generated as in (1), any L out of N + 1 vectors { h n } n = 0 N are linearly independent almost surely, which means that Proposition 3 can be invoked to ensure uniqueness of the group Lasso TV-AR model estimate.
But God's knowledge of that number does not mean that propositions depend on his mind: propositions and truths, not being real, are not created by him.
When I employ my words with every outward show of candor and directness, there simply isn't room for a principled and explanatory distinction between what I say and what I mean, the proposition I express and the proposition I communicate.
