Sentence examples for means in light from inspiring English sources

Consider what this quotation means in light of the current war on terrorism.

Yet Easyjet and British Airways seem unwilling to get on board, stating in emails to me that they only support registered charities -  charities which are stretched beyond their means in light of the millions of people seeking sanctuary.

Towards the end of the talk, a reporter asked the former Google CEO whether he, like many in the media world, thinks we are presently in a tech bubble and what Google's $1.67 billion 2004 IPO at a $23 billion valuation (Google's current valuation is 171.43 billion) means in light of today's IPO valuations.

Symbols refer to observations (annual difference of revised monthly means in black, annual differences of traditional monthly means in light blue), whereas the solid curves indicate field estimates from the CHAOS-2s (red), "extended CHAOS-2s" (magenta), CHAOS-3α (green) and CHAOS-3 (blue) models.

The medical form was completed and signed under penalty of perjury, and commission Chairman Francisco Aguilar said he has asked the state's attorney general to determine what that means in light of the events with Pacquiao's injury and the magnitude of the bout that is expected to shatter all revenue records.

what can ''slight advantage" or ''strong move" etc. mean in light of Zermelo's theorem?

"What do low-cost goods mean in light of the pressing issues of the global environment, global human rights and the global labor force?" Ms. Strasser asked.

They knew how people worked with their products, but they didn't know what they were saying about their products and what those conversations meant in light of their products.

But what does this change mean in light of Montreal's music culture?

Whatever that meant in light of the president's duty to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, if permitted, John Roberts and his court to effectively invalidate a key section of the federal law that was perceived as being antagonistic to same-sex couples -- and it was seen that way because that's the way it was intended.

What does this mean, in light of Brenner's arguments?