Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Superscript letter A means effect size between small and medium Source: Authors own.
JB initiated the study and proposed the ratio of means effect size measure and weighted data integration framework.
Similar(58)
FCC: External feedback on correct following corrects revealed a significant effect, F 2, 164) = 4.74, mean effect size 0.6%, p < 0.0001.
When analyses included less than 20% of eligible studies the mean effect size was 0.64 and when they included over 80% of the eligible studies the mean effect size was 0.31.
In contrast, mean effect size for selection to resistance showed a consistent positive trend in the native range.
FCC: There was a significant main effect of external feedback on corrects following corrects, F 2, 164) = 4.88, mean effect size 17.41 ms, p < 0.008.
Weighted mean effect sizes based on single site studies were generally larger than effect sizes computed based on analysis of the overall multi-site sample.
Weighted mean effect sizes (and number of subjects needed for 80% power at α=0.05) were computed based on the individual single site studies as well as on the overall multi-site study.
On the other hand, mean effect sizes of relative resistance show a different pattern.
In addition, the changes over time in our control condition were similar to mean effect sizes reported for brief intervention.
The overall mean effect size was dependent on the timing of cognitive assessment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com