Sentence examples for meaningful utterances from inspiring English sources

If not, is there, after all, any real difference between meaningful utterances and meaningless noises?

One is proper names of all periods, the majority of which are meaningful utterances with religious content.

All of these questions presuppose that there are facts of the matter about what our words mean, or at least a difference between meaningful utterances and meaningless noises.

Therefore, it is widely recognized that abstract (i.e., nonrepresentational) art forms music, abstract painting, architecture may yet contain meaningful utterances, and most frequently philosophers and critics use terms such as expression in order to describe these elusive meanings.

Through an elaborate network of intrinsic and extrinsic connections, the auditory cortex is thought to bring about the conscious perception of sound and provide a basis for the comprehension and production of meaningful utterances.

Meaningful utterances were grouped and later categorized under several labels.

Under these circumstances, speech and everyday language would indeed be no longer a meaningful utterance that transcends behavior even if it only expresses it, and it would much better be replaced by the extreme and in itself meaningless formalism of mathematical signs.

They have the notion of a meaningful utterance before generating the notion of a meaningful thought, modeled on the former notion.

There are countless sentences with this property: concrete tokens of them exist but no concrete proof or refutation actually exists, none that a human could manipulate as a meaningful utterance anyway.

Similarly, it has been suggested that there is an important difference between hypothetical norms involving ordinary non-normative facts (such as facts about the weather) and norms involving meaning facts: Since meaning facts are constituted by correctness conditions, meaning facts always dictate how I should behave when I intend to produce a meaningful utterance.

Positivism then is for Anderson a commitment to what is objectively and positively the case, and not a program of instrumental or operational truth, nor a means of distinguishing meaningful from meaningless utterances.