Sentence examples for meaning categories from inspiring English sources

The meaning categories are 'male human (man),'femalele human (woman),'humanan (people),' and 'others,' the last contrasting with the three former categories.

His inspiration was in part the traditional syntactic theory of different parts of speech, and in part Husserl's theory of Bedeutungskategorien (meaning categories) from the latter's Logical Investigations.

Thus far I have been describing the formal ontological categories, the correlates of the different meaning categories distinguishable by the nonsense test.

E.g., in the sentence "This tree is green" we may substitute "chair"—but not "careless"—for "tree" without turning sense into nonsense, marking the difference between the meaning categories of nominative material and adjectival material (1913/2000, 511 512).

Husserl is nowhere explicit about the proper method for distinguishing material ontological categories, but he does distinguish material absurdity from formal absurdity, and from the formal nonsense that marks the difference in meaning categories (1913/2000, 523).

Edmund Husserl approaches categories in something like this way, since he begins by laying out categories of meanings, which may then be used to draw out ontological categories (categories of possible objects meant) as the correlates of the meaning categories, without concern for any empirical matter about whether or not there really are objects of the various ontological categories discerned.

With adult speech, they identified the correct meaning category 64percentt of the time, with only moderate success in identifying attention and comfort, and very little in understanding prohibition and approval.

Thus, for example, presumably objects are the ontological correlates of the meaning category of nominative expressions, properties are the ontological correlates of adjectival expressions, and states of affairs are the ontological correlates of propositions.

Because the magnitude and retention of P2 change was larger for Group 2 compared to Group 1, it is possible that participating in the listening task strengthens the effect by inducing some type of meaning, category, or purpose to the otherwise irrelevant sounds.

I have divided this article into three sections which correspond to three different dimensions of those multiple meanings: categories, concepts, and connotations.

A series of discussions were held between AD and MC to refine the content, labelling and meaning of categories.