Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
For mean weekly attack frequency and global percentage change in weekly attack frequency, P values were derived from the t test.
Mean weekly attack frequency over time, global percentage change from baseline in weekly CH attack frequency at the end of the randomised phase, and response rates in the randomised phase were evaluated in this post hoc analysis.
The mean weekly attack frequency was significantly lower with nVNS + SoC than with SoC alone from week 2 of the randomised phase through week 3 of the extension phase (P < 0.02; Fig. 2).
Compared with SoC alone, nVNS + SoC led to a significantly lower mean weekly attack frequency by week 2 of the randomised phase; the attack frequency remained significantly lower in the nVNS + SoC group through week 3 of the extension phase (P < 0.02).
Similar(56)
At the end of the 10-month open phase, the mean weekly attacks frequency decreased by 48.4% (P = 0.08) and emotional impact was significantly reduced (Table 3).
Of those 72 cases, 21 (29%) occurred among trainees in the 554th Battalion (figure 1); 11 cases occurred in Alpha Company (average weekly attack rate 1.4%), and 10 cases occurred in Hotel Company (average weekly attack rate 1.2%).
After 4 weeks, patients' average weekly attack frequency was 41% lower with prophylactic nVNS + SoC treatment than with SoC alone.
Power calculation was based on our estimate that at baseline mean weekly frequency of attacks would be 23.9 (SD 3.7).
There was no significant change in the mean weekly frequency of attacks after implantation compared to baseline, although two patients (C1P4 and C4P1) still showed a "lesion effect" (decrease ≥50%) 1 month after surgery.
The primary end point of PREVA was achieved, demonstrating a significantly more pronounced reduction from baseline in weekly attack frequency with nVNS + SoC than with SoC alone and yielding a mean therapeutic benefit of 3.9 fewer attacks per week (P = 0.02) [12].
The mean weekly camp populations (under 5's and 5 years and older) were used as denominator to estimate attack rates (AR).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com