Sentence examples for mean variation between from inspiring English sources

Mean variation between the latest and the earliest of the four sessions were 23 ± 28 min, and the variation was no more than an hour in 41 of 49 subjects.

The mean variation between measurements within sessions was 10%, which includes random variation and variation due to environmental effects.

**Inter- and intra-assay validation was calculated as the mean variation between 8 individual determinations of each human serum sample.

The mean variation between the two pretreatment values ranged from 13 to 14 to 25%, respectively, for M65, M30 and qRT PCR.

Percentage dilution recovery and percentage intra/inter variation are indicated as mean values of different samples diluted 1 2 and 1 4 and as mean variation between ten individual determinations of human samples, respectively.

Inter- and intra-assay variations were calculated as the mean variation between ten individual determinations of eight QC samples (human serum) with each run consisting of two replicas of double determinations of the samples.

In Fig. 9b, the differences of coordination in the z-direction for the three conditions are highly significant according to repeated measures ANOVA (F (2, 22) = 27.751, **p < 0.001) (F-value means variation between sample means divided by variation within the sample).

Per degree correlations between mean secular variations: solid line, SV1 (mean secular variation between 1980 and 1999) and SV3 (mean secular variation between 1999 and 2004); dashes, SV2 (mean secular variation between 1994 and 1999) and SV3; dots, SV3 and SV4 (mean secular variation between 2004 and 2009).

Results are expressed as the mean variation in pupil constriction between the first 480 nm reference stimulation and the subsequent 480 nm test stimulation.

The mean variation was significantly different between such subgroups (−6.1% vs +143.50% P<0.0001; see Supplementary Figure A). Figure 2C showed that TSP-1 decreased, if compared with d1, after 5 months of treatment (d155) with a trend towards significance (P=0.059), whereas significantly increased at the time of progression if compared with d155 (P=0.049).

The coefficients of EIGRF, which are secular variation coefficients, we recall, were computed as the simple average of the mean secular variation between epoch 2000 and epoch 2005 of the N = 3 above-mentioned models.