Sentence examples for mean variance in from inspiring English sources

The first hypothesis seems less likely, since the global-amount of extracted CC was larger in polygyne than monogyne eggs and the chemical profiles of eggs presented some differences across polygyne colonies (Mean variance in the relative amount of each peak across polygyne colonies (± SE) = 0.439±0.049).

Mean variance in BMI per individual over the period from registration is seen to be low.

This new term consists in the inverse of the gene mean variance in equation 10, since biclusters with higher gene variances are preferred and the fitness is going to be minimized in the algorithm.

(ii) The maximum opportunity for selection (I) which is the standardized mean variance in ARS and describes the distribution of reproductive success within each class (Arnold and Wade 1984) and (iii) Morisita's index (I δ ) (Morisita 1962), a predictor of spatial clumping.

For the two locus model the following equation was used: Var = Q1 + Q2 + Q1xQ2 + e, where Var = the between-strain mean variance in the trait, Q1 and Q2 are makers tightly linked to the loci, Q1XQ2 is the 'additive-by-additive' epistatic interaction term, and e is the residual error.

We then calculated the mean, variance, and skewness in each half-year.

The mean variance is shown in Figure 6 separately for all four dataset lengths.

We found that libraries prepared from the two WGA time points were virtually indistinguishable in terms of mean coverage, variance in coverage, mean GC content, and number of putative chimeras (data not shown).

Total refers to the total number of irredundant probes and genes, with means and variances of models for each endpoint be listed in Mean (Variance).

Furthermore, they assert that one could interpret the mean and variance in phylogenomics differently: the mean signal corresponding to speciations/extinctions, and the variance to LGT and other non-vertical processes [ 50].

That means variance differences in study success cannot traced back casually to variances in taking personal responsibility for their own study 0 = wrong or no aspect is denoted and justified Why could the authors come to this conclusion?