Sentence examples for mean utility ranged from inspiring English sources

In these 6 studies, the mean utility ranged from 0.66 to 0.80.

For example, for the 10.5% of patients who had previously experienced a stroke or TIA, the mean utility ranged from approximately 0.650 (for Fryback and Franks SF-12-MEPS algorithms), up to 0.783 for the Shaw (EQ-5D) algorithm.

Overall health-related quality of life of the subjects was good (mean utility ranged from 0.68 (±0.08) to 0.85 ±0.14) over the nine utility measures) and comparable to patients without diabetes.

Calculated utilities and categories of utility are reported in Table 2. Mean utilities ranged from 0.84 (40% risk of erectile dysfunction + 10% risk of incontinence) to 0.95 (10% risk of incontinence).

Mean utilities ranged from 0.54 (SF-12, stage IV) to 0.62 (EQ-5D, stage III) at admission, and from 0.58 (SF-12, stage IV) to 0.84 (EQ-5D, stage III) at discharge.

For the eight health states that included an SRE (health states B I), mean VAS scores ranged from 1.0 to 31.7, and mean TTO utilities ranged from 0.15 to 0.45.

When these cost s were weighted by the individual mean health status (area under the Karnofsky curve), the cost utility ranged from €41167 to €53369 per QALY gained.

The mean differences between SG and HUI2 utilities ranged from 0.10 (0.08 to 0.12) to 0.22 (0.20 to 0.24).

For chronic GVHD, a mean utility of 0.9 (range 0.75 to 1) was reported [ 16 ].

When the QoLwas summarized in utilities, the utilities ranged from 0.37 to 0.96.

The utility for diabetes without hypoglycaemia ranged from 0.88 to 0.97, the mean utility for rare hypoglycaemic events (quarterly) ranged between 0.85 and 0.94.