Sentence examples for mean uptake time from inspiring English sources

We developed a mathematical model of the uptake process that allows determination of key parameters of endocytosis, including the rate of uptake, the number of nanoparticles per cell in saturation, the mean uptake time, and the correlation between the number of internalized nanoparticles and their extracellular concentration.

All patients were scanned on a GE-Discovery690 (GE Medical Systems Milwaukee, WI) with a mean uptake time of 66 min (range 60-75 mins).

The mean FDG-dose was 371 ± 25 (standard deviation [SD]) MBq and the mean uptake time was 67 ± 10 (SD) min. None of the patients had CR or CMR.

There was a significant interaction effect such that the site 1 mean uptake increased over time from 12.9 to 26.2 occasions, while the site 2 mean uptake stayed relatively constant over time from 31.6 to 32 occasions (p=0.02).

The mean uptake for all time points was quantified in whole-body images and showed that the lungs had the highest signal (32.7%), followed by the liver (14.2%), spleen (7.3%), and kidneys (2.5%).

In so far as was possible, the scanning conditions were kept constant facilitating comparison of the pretreatment and intratreatment scans, that is, same acquisition protocol, reconstruction algorithm and uptake time (mean Δ t=3.9 min).

All the PET scans were performed in two-dimensional mode (six to eight bed positions with 8 min of emission and 4 min of transmission) (FDG uptake time at bPET: mean, 88 min (SDev, ±19.1 min); FDG uptake time at iPET: mean, 76 min (SDev, ±20.4 min)).

The target uptake time was 75 ± 10 mins; the observed mean difference in actual uptake times between the two scans was 0.2 mins (sd = 13.5).

Mean change in SUVmax A linear mixed effects analysis was used to assess if the mean change in SUVmax varied across trial sites, tumor location, or with uptake time (t2-t1).

However, TLR exhibits an uptake time dependence comparable to that of tissue SUV itself (without a generally accepted means of quantitatively correcting for this effect in either case).

A linear mixed effects analysis showed that the mean change in SUVmax did not vary signifcantly varied across trial sites (or scanners), tumor location, or with uptake time (t2-t1).