Sentence examples for mean total point from inspiring English sources

Mean total point motion was 1.7 mm (SD 1.7).

At age 11 years, girls continued to maintain the same mean total score (61 points) but the mean score for boys increased (68 points).

The mean total score was 15.9 points, with a maximum possible score of 29 points.

The GI got a mean total score of 53.1 points (SD = 8.59) on average; the mean total score of the GNI was 51.8 points (SD = 9.0).

In these cases, the mean total spiral score increased by 0.53±0.84 points (range=2.25 point increase to 1.5 point decrease), and the total spiral score increased at an average rate of 0.10±0.20 points per year.

In these, the mean total spiral score increased by 0.60±0.88 points (range=2.75 point increase to 1.25 point decrease), and the total spiral score increased at an average rate of 0.10±0.16 points per year.

No harmful side effects of treatment with IO have been found.> -wrap-foot> numberer of patients, Mean mean total arch constriction score (points), Mean diff mean differences, SD standard deviation, 95 % CI 95%% confidence interval of the difference Differences between the buccal cleft side and the buccal non-cleft side scores were significant at both 9 and 12 years of age (Table  8).

This significance was not demonstrated at the age of 9 years.> -wrap-foot> numberer of patients, Mean mean total arch constriction score (points), SD standard deviation, 95%CI95%95 % confidence interval of the difference aThe difference between age 9 and 12 years was tested for each center by means of an ANOVA.

The mean total score was 4.4 points higher for the 'exposed' students compared to the 'non-exposed' students (8.4 versus 4.2 respectively. Unpaired t tests were performed to investigate the differences between these groups. Seven out of 10 K-REC items (items 8a and 8b were considered separately) showed a significant difference (questions 1, 3, 6, 7, 8a, 8b and 9).

Improvements of 10% (15.6 points) in the mean total score post-workshop, and 15% (23.4 points) at follow-up were considered clinically/educationally important, compared to baseline.

At this time point the mean total tumor volume in the HRG−/− group was more than three times higher than in the HRG+/+ group (Fig. 2B, table 1).