Suggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The overall mean total impact score was 7.52.
Prevalence of overall impacts was 57.8% and 60.8% (mean total impact score was 7.10 and 7.77) in the intervention and control group, respectively.
Similar(58)
The longitudinal associations found between maternal self-rated oral health at the age-5 assessment and study members' OHRQOL at age 32 were noteworthy, with clear gradients in the mean OHIP-14 score, the mean total number of impacts, and the prevalence of one or more impacts overall.
3D-CT did not influence the technique chosen (arthrotomy vs. no arthrotomy), the frequency of use of a femoral distractor, or the frequency or type of bone graft used.> The level of training of the observer did not have a statistically significant impact on the mean total score (p = 0.163), regardless of the type of plan (2D- vs 3D-CT).
Tables 6a-wrap>, 6b-wrap>, 6c-wrap> show the impact of the above changes on the mean total societal costs for each of the pairwise comparisons.
This method was applied for Belgium and surroundings and shows that the identification of the appropriate scale at which topographical obstacles impact precipitation is crucial in order to obtain reliable mean total annual precipitation maps.
Mothers who rated their oral health as poor (or who were edentulous) at the age-5 assessment had offspring with higher mean total OHIP-14 score at age 32, and higher mean count of total number of impacts at age 32, than did mothers who did not rate their oral health as poor, and were dentate.
The number of dairy cows owned has a large and statistically significant impact on household cash income; each cow owned increased income by 80% of the mean total income of non-adopting households.
With respect to the impact of outpatient's demographic and clinical characteristics on staff costs, age correlated significantly and negatively with mean total costs per patient.
The prevalence of oral impacts was 58.1% in the Validation Sample versus 46.0% in the Working Sample, with mean total scores of 9.1 ± 14.8 and 5.7 ± 10.2, respectively.
Total impact.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com