mean thicknesses of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mean thicknesses of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing average measurements or dimensions, particularly in scientific or technical writing. Example: "The mean thicknesses of the various materials were measured to determine their suitability for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

Using design-based stereological methods, the exchange surface areas of peripheral (terminal and intermediate) villi and their fetal capillaries and the arithmetic and harmonic mean thicknesses of the villous membrane (maternal surface of villous trophoblast to adluminal surface of vascular endothelium) were estimated.

Placenta

There were increases in arithmetic mean thicknesses of epithelium and interstitium.

Duke University

The next two layers, epithelium and Bowman's layer, had mean thicknesses of 49.7 ± 1.4 μm and 19.2 ± 1.2 μm, respectively.

Biomedical Optics Express

Mean thicknesses of retina, GCC/GCIPL, and choroid were automatically acquired through one SS-OCT scan (DRI OCT-1, Topcon).

BMC Ophthalmology

Peripheral tibial deficits with a mean depth of 19 mm were reconstructed by metal blocks and tibial inserts with mean thicknesses of 9 mm and 11 mm, respectively.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

For each blood vessel, three random positions were selected and the vessel wall thickness was determined as the mean thicknesses of the three positions.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The current mean thickness of the MFF exceeds 600 m48.

Nature

where is the mean thickness of the spherical shell (equivalently, is the mean signal longevity).

Nature

Twin thickness measurements in Fig. 3 e) shows a similar distribution and a similar mean thickness of 3 nm for all HT-HPT samples.

Nature

The reservoir has a mean thickness of 219 m ±ơ = 3% comprising 51% of pay.

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Results: The mean thickness of the SUFML was 3.04 mm (range 1.74-3.78 mm, SD ±0.63 mm).

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting "mean thicknesses of" materials or structures, always specify the method of measurement and the sample size to ensure reproducibility and validity.

Common error

Avoid using "mean thicknesses of" when the data is heavily skewed. In such cases, the "median thicknesses of" might be a more representative measure of central tendency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mean thicknesses of" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as a subject, object, or complement within a sentence. It refers to the average measurement of multiple thicknesses, commonly in scientific and technical contexts. As Ludwig AI suggests, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

95%

News & Media

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "mean thicknesses of" is a grammatically sound and scientifically relevant term for describing average dimensions, as supported by Ludwig AI. While not exceptionally common, its use is particularly prevalent in scientific and technical fields. When using this phrase, remember to specify the measurement method and sample size. Common errors include using it with skewed data, where the "median thicknesses of" may be more appropriate. Consider alternatives like "average thicknesses of" for broader audiences. The context dictates whether to use this phrase but remember that this phrase is best used when high levels of precision and formality are intended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

average thickness values of

Replaces "mean" with "average" and "thicknesses" with "thickness values" maintaining the core meaning but providing a more explicit clarification.

typical thickness of

Uses "typical" instead of "mean", indicating a representative or common thickness, rather than a calculated average.

average depth of

Substitutes "thicknesses" with "depth", focusing on the distance from a surface rather than general dimensional extent.

mean layer thickness of

Adds "layer" to specify the type of thickness being discussed, implying a material arranged in a layer.

average membrane thickness of

Specifies "membrane" to narrow down the context to membranes, changing the context from generic thicknesses.

representative thickness values of

Combines the ideas of a representative value with explicit thickness values, using representative instead of mean.

nominal thickness of

Replaces "mean" with "nominal", which denotes a designated or theoretical thickness, rather than an actual measured average.

median thicknesses of

Uses "median" instead of "mean", focusing on the central value of the thicknesses rather than the average.

general thickness of

Substitutes "mean" with "general", indicating an overall or common thickness without precise measurement.

prevalent thicknesses of

Replaces "mean" with "prevalent", focusing on the most common or frequently occurring thicknesses.

FAQs

How is "mean thicknesses of" used in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, "mean thicknesses of" is used to report the average thickness of multiple samples or layers, often accompanied by standard deviation to indicate variability. For example, "The mean thicknesses of the coatings were measured using electron microscopy."

What is an alternative to "mean thicknesses of" that sounds less technical?

A less technical alternative to "mean thicknesses of" is "average thicknesses of". This conveys the same basic meaning in a more accessible way.

Is it more accurate to say "mean thicknesses of" or "average thicknesses of"?

The terms are largely interchangeable. "Mean" refers to the arithmetic average, which is often what's intended. However, if the data is skewed, the "median thicknesses of" might be more representative, but the term "average" is often loosely used to describe the mean.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "mean thicknesses of"?

"Mean thicknesses of" is appropriate in any context where you need to report the average thickness of something, especially in technical reports, scientific papers, and engineering specifications. For broader audiences, consider using "average thickness of".