Sentence examples for mean t values from inspiring English sources

Figure  14B shows the mean T values at each point when these parameters were changed.

Furthermore, mean T values reached the significant level (3.0) only when onset delay was 5 and 10 s.

Thus, mean T values were higher in the contralateral SI area than in the other areas for 0-s onset delay, while T values decreased with longer onset delays and decreased below the level of significance for 15-s onset delay.

The mean t value was computed across the voxels within an anatomical region.

However, when the data were compared by paired t-test, the mean T value with 5-s onset delay was larger than that with 0 s, and the mean T value with 10-s onset delay was larger than that with 15 s (paired t test, P < 0.05).

Post hoc comparison indicated that the mean T value with 15-s onset delay was significantly smaller than those with 0-, 5- and 10-s onset delay (Bonferroni test, P < 0.05).

Post-hoc comparison indicated that the mean T value with 0-s onset delay in the contralateral SI area was larger than those in the ipsilateral SI area and bilateral SPL (Bonferroni test, P < 0.05).

Mean t-values for activated voxels during the SO period indicated a pattern of contralateral preference according to Mesulam's model described above [4] (see Fig. 2a, left).

Within the left FPN, positive mean t-values were observed in IPTO (T: 2.18), PIPS (T: 1.39) and the FEF (T: 1.41) which corresponded to a preference for the right hemifield.

In early visual areas (VO), both hemispheres showed a contralateral preference that was stronger in left VO (mean t-value T: 2.27) than in right VO (T: −0.68) (see Fig. 2c, left).

Yet activated clusters reached higher mean t-values compared to mean t-values of activation in children with DD (p < 0.001).