Sentence examples for mean t lag from inspiring English sources

(A ) Mean t lag (pHdrop hemifusion ) for Udorn and mean t lag (arrest hemifusion ) for X31-HA virions.

(D ) Mean t lag (pHdrop arrest ) and t lag (arrest hemifusion ).

(D ) pH 4.5, mean t lag (pHdrop hemifusion ) for indicated virions.

(A ) pH 5.5, mean t lag (arrest hemifusion ) for X31-HA WT, S 4 G HA 2 Udorn and mean t lag (pHdrop hemifusion ) for Udorn WT, G 4 S HA 2 X 31, D 112 A HA 2 Udorn and D 112 A HA 2 X 31.

Mean values for t lag (pHdrop arrest) and t lag (arrest hemifusion ) show the same pH dependence, with mean t lag (pHdrop arrest ) being about an order of magnitude shorter throughout the tested pH range.

At pH 4.5 and below, the mutants described above have indistinguishable mean values for t lag (pHdrop hemifusion ).

And, log (mean t ) = intercept + temperature lag 0 – 1 + temperature lag 2 – 6 + temperature lag 7 – 13 + rain lag 0 – 1 + rain lag 2 – 6 + rain lag 7 – 13 + s time, df = 6 per year of data).

The models used for this analysis could be expressed as: Deaths t ~ Poisson (mean t ) log (mean t ) = intercept + s temperature lag 0 – 1, df = 4) + s temperature lag 2 – 6, df = 4) + s temperature lag 7 – 13, df = 4) + s rain lag 0 – 1, df = 4) + s rain lag 2 – 6, df = 4) + s rain lag 7 – 13, df = 4) + s time, df = 6 per year of data).

Figure 1 presents the gastric emptying data of patients and healthy subjects and shows that Crohn's disease patients had both t 1/2 (mean±SEM= 192.0 ± 7.7 minutes) and t lag (mean±SEM= 127.7 ± 4.5 minutes) values significantly longer (p<0.05) than those found in healthy controls (t 1/2 mean±SEM= 166.5 ± 6.6 minutes; t lag mean±SEM= 110.7 ± 5.3 minutes).

However, there was no statistical difference in the t lag (panel A) between the two subgroups with (mean±SEM= 132.8 ± 5.4 minutes) or without dyspeptic symptoms (mean±SEM= 120.8 ± 7.3 minutes).

t lag (arrest hemifusion ) vs t lag (pHdrop arrest ) for X31-HA virions at pH 5.5 (n = 380).