Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The mean stone size was 30 × 15.8 mm, as measured directly on the surgical specimen.
Mean stone size was 16.4 mm.
The mean number of stones was 2.3, and the mean stone size was 16.4 mm.
Similar(57)
The mean preoperative stone size was 14.9 mm (range 6 to 20).
The mean urinary stone size was smaller (3.62 ± 3.23 mm versus 4.15 ± 2.36 mm, p < 0.001) and the stones were more radiolucent (25.7% versus 13.2%, p < 0.001) in the NECT group compared to the IVP group.
Panoramic radiograph and CT scan were comparable in precise preoperative estimation of stone size, regardless of stone location.
Median stone size observed in the Qatar population was larger, and most stones were found in the lower ureter or at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ).
In contrast, Berner and Evenari (1978) reported larger mean stone thickness values for uncolonized light and dark flint stones (16 20 mm) as compared to colonized ones (11 15 mm).
Stone size influences the rate of spontaneous stone passage.
Rates increase from 48% for stones located in the proximal ureter to 79% for stones located at the vesicoureteric junction, regardless of stone size.
In addition, using multiple logistic regression analysis, we examined the factors of stone clearance (alcohol etiology, stone location, stone number, stone size, and success/failure of guidewire negotiation).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com