Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
et.al. [1] report a mean step size of 11 base pairs with standard error of 3 base pairs which puts our point estimate within their 95% confidence intervals.
Hypothesis tests to study the effect of force, NS3 and ATP concentration on step size suggests that the mean step size might be independent of the force applied, NS3 and ATP concentrations.
If so, does their exclusion lead to an agreement between step size between the two studies with respect to the mean step size? 2. Stepping Velocity: There are some basic differences in which the velocities are computed in the two studies and as such are incomparable.
From this, we can estimate a temperature-independent mean step size of 1.9±0.6 bp.
The mean step size along the long axis was ∼100 nm/3 s.
The mean step size was determined by fitting the distribution with where which takes into account the asymmetric distance distribution due to noise.
Similar(50)
Furthermore, the observed rates of replisome movement (mean step sizes of ∼100 nm/3 s and a Dapp of ∼(5 7 × 10) nm/s) are of the order one would predict for the replication of ∼450 × 10 kb independent chromosomal domains since such domains would have a diameter of ∼100 nm and take ∼12 s to replicate.
The mean convergence, the steady-state performance and the mean step-size behavior of the MRVSS algorithm are studied under a slow time-varying system model, which can be served as guidelines for the design of MRVSS algorithm in practical applications.
The Monte Carlo carried out equilibration for 20000 steps (with a mean fractional step size of 0.1) and then stored for the next 2000 steps (with a mean fractional step size of 0.02).
The Markov Chain Monte Carlo carried out equilibration for 3000 steps (with a mean fractional parameter step size of 0.05) and then marginalized over the next 300 steps (with a mean fractional parameter step size of 0.01).
This means that the step size needs to be small for the solution to be stable, and therefore, a large number of iterations are required.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com