Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
The mean step count was 6,309 ± 2,392 steps/day.
Table 2 indicates that there is a clear association between increasing composite child-adult fitness and mean step count (P = 0.007).
The increase in steps observed from baseline appears to have been maintained in the intervention group (mean step count week 12: 9351, week 24: 9161, P = 0.65).
An interim evaluation in September 2006 revealed that a large percent of women who underwent the baseline evaluation had mean step counts between 5000 and 6000 steps/day, so the protocol was amended to include women who were "low-active," with a baseline mean step count of ≤6000 steps/day.
In our sensitivity models (results not shown), the multivariate regression models also included physical activity (mean step count from pedometers worn for three consecutive days) and dietary factors (mean daily calories consumed over three consecutive days, number of fruits and vegetables consumed each day, etc).
The stride length was calculated by dividing the total distance walked (20 metres) by the mean step count [ 59].
Similar(50)
During the day this means step counting, and using that to extrapolate the length of time you may have spent walking or running, and an estimated calorie burn.
Physical activity was monitored using the Kenz Lifecorder, and mean step counts and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) times were calculated over a 1-week period.
In a larger study of older adults in the UK (n = 121) [ 23], Harris et al. reported that pedometer step counts were highly correlated to the accelerometer (Actigraph GT1M) step counts (r = 0.86) and the mean step counts were similar.
At 12 weeks, mean daily step count reduced by 84095%5% CI −1,947 to 266) in the control group and by 22 (−1,407 to 1,364) in the intervention group (P = 0.4).
Quadriceps muscle strength, exercise endurance, and free-living physical activity were assessed using a Cybex NORM dynamometer, an endurance shuttle walk test, and an ActivPAL accelerometer (mean daily step count), respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com