Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
But the largest difference was that there were no stems larger than 29 cm dsh in either the sugarcane or the banana plot (Table 6), which led to a much smaller mean stem size in the secondary plots.
(3) In the secondary plots, there were no stems larger than 29 cm dsh at breast height, which lead to a much smaller mean stem size and lower basal area, above-ground biomass, and canopy closure compared to the primary plots at both sites.
(2) The mean stem size was similar between the primary Maquipucuna plots and the Yanacocha plot, but the Yanacocha plot had more total stems and more stems in each size category, which lead to more basal area, above-ground biomass, and canopy closure at Yanacocha compared to Maquipucuna.
Although the mean stem size was similar between the primary MR plots and the YR plot (Table 5), the YR plot had more total stems and more stems in each size category which lead to more basal area, AGB, and canopy closure at YR.
The mean stem size of 10.2 mm in the revision cases and 11.2 mm in the non-revision cases confirmed that a thin stem was used in the revision cases.
For the stand values we compared observed and predicted height:diameter ratios of dominant trees (100 largest trees per hectare), and of the mean stem size (quadratic mean diameter and Loreýs mean height weighted by basal area) at the end of the simulation period.
Similar(54)
Thus, the average stem size was 4.6.
Where radial gradients are present, mean stem density increases or decreases with stem size and thus estimates of stem biomass and in turn carbon based on a mean species density become inaccurate (Nogueira et al., 2008).
This means that information such as stem size, neck length, head size, and material used in the individual THR is available.
Conversely, the proportion of useable cells for calculating mean stem volume was stable for all cell sizes.
Cement type (viscosity); maximum, minimum, or mean cement mantle thickness; cementing grade; degenerative or inflammatory disease; stem size; neck size; or orientation had no (statistically significant) influence on migration (pattern) of the stem (all p > 0.01).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com