Sentence examples for mean standard length from inspiring English sources
This could to some extent explain the deviating diving behaviours of females in the Bothnian Bay where the mean standard length of females was 128.8± 4.2 cm (SD), although differences in bathymetric conditions may play a major role.
Therefore, a part of the difference could be caused by size differences between the sexes, since the mean standard length of tagged females was 119.7±7.1 cm (SD) compared with 124.5±5.0 cm (SD) for males in the two southern areas combined.
Mean standard length and L50 were positively correlated across lakes (r = 0.69, P = 0.06).
The first group (size class 1) was composed of 7 individuals with a mean standard length of 3 mm.
The mean standard length, wet weight and average size difference between fish in each group are provided in Table S2, the supporting information.
However, because observations of multiple clutches of offspring from a single father were not independent, we regressed the mean standard length of all offspring of each sire on maximum total length of sire.
To remove effects of body size and allometric scaling of intestinal length between terapontid species, the "phyl_resid" function outlined by Revell [ 58] was used to regress mean species' intestinal lengths against mean standard lengths to produce phylogenetically size-corrected residuals in the R package "phytools" [ 59, 60].
Within the group of unmated pairs, females smaller than the mean female standard length of the population showed significantly more courtship behavior towards the males than females larger than the mean female standard length (Mann-Whitney U test: Nmale smaller = 4, Nmale larger = 5, z = -2.205, p = 0.032).
The mean (standard deviation) length of hospitalization for these cases was five (7) days, while for non-cases it was three (3) days.
Mean standard body length was 16.1 to 16.5 mm and weight was 52.1 to 54.6 g, at the end of the experiment (Table 3).
Body sizes (mean standard body length) in the first 3 births were approximately 25% lower than those in the last 3 births after 5 weeks (n = 68, F5, 62 = 5.25, P<0.001) (Fig. 1C).
